Page 14 - Acoustic Fluid Level Measurements
P. 14

Applied Well Testing (Pressure Transient)                                                     7-1





        Petroleum Extension-The University of Texas at Austin

                                                              7


                    Applied Well Testing for Pressure Transient Data Acquisition




               In this chapter:
                   •  Automatic acoustic determination of formation pressure
                   •  Factors that influence pressure transient testing
                   •  Programmed fluid level surveys
                   •  Data acquisition and processing background
                   •  Recommended procedures for optimum quality of recorded data
                   •  Examples of well surveys from the field





               Proper reservoir management and production optimi-  are produced through artificial lift pumping systems.
               zation  require  up-to-date  information  about  forma-  Therefore, it is necessary to monitor and analyze the
               tion pressure, permeability, and wellbore skin factor.   performance of these systems. The principal tools that
               Pressure  transient  tests  using  wireline-conveyed  or   are used in the field to determine indicators that influence
               permanently installed surface readout pressure gauges   production rates—such as reservoir pressure, formation
               are commonly run into flowing wells. However, the   permeability, productivity index, pump efficiency, and
               presence of artificial lift equipment complicates and   skin factor—include:
               often precludes the use of wireline-conveyed devices.   •  Flowing BHP surveys
               Thus, conventional pressure transient tests are seldom   •  Pressure buildup tests
               performed in these wells. The result is poor reservoir   •  Pressure drawdown tests
               and production management.
                   Since the 1980s , the oil and gas industry has relied   •  Inflow performance analyses
                                3,6
               on programmable equipment to calculate bottomhole   These techniques are widely used in flowing wells and
               pressure (BHP) from surface pressure and acoustically   some gas lift wells, where the pressure information is
               measured liquid level data in pumping wells. Over the   easily obtained from wireline-conveyed BHP recorders.
               years, advances in electronics, computer software, and   In rod-pumped wells, the presence of sucker rods
               transducer technology have vastly improved the data   essentially precludes the practical, routine, and direct
               quality and usability of this equipment. In fact, because   measurement of BHP, thus eliminating the single most
               the equipment provides real-time data with the quality   important parameter for well analysis. Permanent in-
               that is necessary for pressure transient analysis, this   stallation of surface-indicating BHP gauges is not yet
               method is considered to be a reliable  and cost-effective   cost-effective for wells with low production rates. As
                                             11
               way to determine BHP.                              discussed in chapter 6, one solution to this problem
                   From  a  management  perspective,  the  industry’s   is to calculate the BHP from the casinghead pressure
               primary objective is to achieve maximum production   measurement and then determine the annular fluid head
               efficiency  with  minimum  engineering  and  technical   from echometric surveys that yield the depth of the gas/
               labor.  The  majority  of  onshore  oilwells  in  the  U.S.   liquid interface and the gradient of the annular fluids .
                                                                                                             1,2
                              For distribution by Petroleum Extension-The University of Texas at Austin
                                                                                                              7-1
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19